Lazy-Liberals: definition, behavior, habitat, and opportunities for improvement

This post is inspired by Dharma (a Hindu doctrine) and by interactions on twitter with @RajivMessage (Shri Rajiv Malhotra) and @sirfAK (Shri Ajay Singh). We will be happy to provide customized personal advice on 'How to step out of Lazy-Liberalism'. You may message us on Twitter at @LearntLies. Author: Brahm Chandal, An Intellectual Kshatriya

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This piece looks at the Liberal-Conservative dichotomy from the lens of Hindu philosophy, and defines the concept of Lazy-Liberal.

Liberal is used as a tag for someone that is open to a variety of ideas that may oppose his or her beliefs. However, over time and over-use the term has become a label for political distinctions. People are identified as Liberal in opposition to being Conservative.

The author does not identify as either liberal or conservative!

A liberal is meant to be open to receiving ideas that are contrary to her or his belief or belief-system. Yet, someone who accepts foreign ideas without understanding them, their foundation, their intent and their manifestations is merely being LAZY!

Definition

Hence the terms Lazy-Liberal or Auto-Liberal: Someone who does not question the beliefs that he or she may be absorbing, accepting or justifying. A Lazy-Liberal is not selective (विवेकहीन) and hence is on auto-pilot. The auto-pilot drives the individual on self-serving arrogance (अहंकार).

As there is a substantially large number of Lazy-Liberals, this has resulted in the liberal-choice or liberal-claim often being an arrogant false self-belief of superior choice or behavior. Resulting in the liberal falling in the trap that he or she claims is the Conservative-condition.

Behavior

Lazy-Liberals may be involved in activism that is often counter-productive. While their stated goals will be undeniably noble their modus operandi and real outcomes are dubious.

They campaign for causes that even a ten year-old will applaud. Who will not applaud human-rights, animal rights, environment protection, feminine equality, religious freedom, and peace. Yet, a lot of NGO's operating for these social causes are self-serving and dubious. Some NGO's have hidden agendas. The soldiers of these NGO's are unwitting Lazy-Liberals.

They often have comfortable lives, but circumstances may have resulted in weak self-respect. Their living standards allow them to ignore the vagaries and struggles of challenging lives. All challenges in their life are self-created. Sub-conscious realization of this state leads to reduction in self-respect leading to subliminal grief. Automatic Lazy-Liberalism is a short, one-shot, panacea to overcoming that grief.

Habitat

Lazy-Liberals are found in US, Canada, UK, and other parts of the world that have forcefully developed pockets of English-education-inspired-and-manipulated self-destruction. They have comfortable, secure lives. Their lives are on-auto. They have access to various time-killing facilities whose over-use leaves them with little time for contemplating their mental positions.

Opportunities for improvement

Lazy-Liberals need to take a pause and revisit their positions. Exercises for developing a tendency to question beliefs, improving self-respect, overcoming arrogance, developing respect for 'others', would likely help get rid of the Lazy tag. Stepping out of Lazy-Liberalism requires exploring foundations of ideas that he or she may be tempted to support mindlessly. You may contact me for further customized assistance in the matter. 

Serving the world of on-auto pilots,

Brahm Chandal

Who created Caste, When, Who suffered, and why we should UNITE to annihilate this scourge

A Request on this Sensitive and Controversial topic:

This is a Sensitive and Controversial topic. We request your patience in reading our argument. Our intent is to UNITE Indian society and remove invalid practices that may have crept in. 

Please note that there is a distinction between Caste, Jati and Varna. So when reading the content please take care to note the specific word used in the context. Fraudulent interchangeable use of these words by the British over centuries has obfuscated the field and made it more difficult to see the differences. However, with a little care it will become clear. Please note that Jati can have several connotations and the most heinous and troublesome connotations are the ones that are expressed by CASTE. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are some answers from our book Learnt Lies. Some elements of the text below are direct from the book. Hence for citations / copyright please use: 

'Learnt Lies: Tools, Analysis and a Proposal for Rediscovering Truth'© 2016

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We were asked the following questions in a comment. We thank you for the comment. Unfortunately we do not know whom to credit for the questions. 

Comments are helpful for us to think through various aspects and the interest in the topic encourages us to pursue our goal to annihilate  the British-created-atrocity-of-Caste.

We have dealt with these questions in our book. Since, the book will not be available for the general public for a couple more weeks, hence we answer your queries here:

If Varna is not related to Jati, then 

• What is Jati?

Jati is a commonly used word that lacks a specific or single technical meaning in Indian languages. Jati is used to refer to ethnicity, gender (as in मर्द-जाती), profession, status, class, royalty, nationality, species, genus, (as in type of animal), a group or sub-group of people, race, family, breeding, clan, sect, religion or community. Its meaning is dependent on the context of the sentence. There were no religious-scriptural mandated divisions of Indian society on the base of Jati (we deal with Varna below). 

Both Gandhi and Dr. Ambedkar had concluded that Jati does NOT mean Caste.

Varna also has several meanings, but there is one 'specific' technical term that is relevant for us here. Caturvarnavyavastha is a classification into four categories of the professions that people fill in society. The classification is done with the intention of determining what is needed for a successful society. Such classifications are done today as well by Census boards, Education ministries and economic studies that forecast requirements and shortages of professions necessary for the well-being of society. A Varna is one of the four super-classifications that Hindu Shastra used to group every legitimate profession in society. Varna when used in this sense is a technical term for the Caturvarnavyavastha. 

Varna is also used as a technical term with different meanings in other bodies of Hindu thought. Both Dr. Ambedkar and Gandhi concluded that Varna does NOT mean Caste.

Caste was a term 'constructed' by the British and Europeans that believed in the purity of ancestral lineage. Classifications of caste were Octoroon, Quadroon, Quinteroon, Half-Caste and similar terms referring to the purity of the blood. The term was later used by the British to obfuscate the distinction between Varna and Jati for the sole purpose of dividing Indian society to cause harm to its people. 

• When was Jati created?

In Hindu scriptures the term Jati was never created as such! In Indian languages Jati is a non-technical colloquial term referring to where one is born. 

However, in the sense of Caste: Caste as the word is used today was introduced into India by the British within the last several hundred years. And we have pinpointed specific records to date this.

Caste is related to British and European slavery laws.

Please note that Jati can have several connotations and the most heinous and troublesome connotations are the ones that are expressed by CASTE.  

We will share a lot of information here, but would invite you to read the arguments in the flow we intended in our book. 

• Who created Caste?

Caste (the 'vulgate' meaning attributed to Jati) was created by the British. The restriction on the inter-caste marriage is also British orchestrated. We give detailed explanation of this.

• Why was Caste created?

The British created this to divide the populace so that they would never rise against British crimes as one group. British crimes included events like chopping off the thumbs of whole villages of weavers! This supported the monopoly of British cloth producing labourers and factories. Weavers were conveniently classified by the British as untouchables to separate them from the rest of society so that they can be targeted and destroyed in smaller groups. 

A parallel here is the creation of divisions between the Hutus and Tutsis of Rwanda via the fraudulent race-science and race-studies that had British roots and which the Belgians sustained. This tragic differentiation led to the Rwandan Genocide nearly two hundred years after the seeds of division were sown. We traced this history with references. 

• Who benefited from Caste & who is still benefiting?

Ambedkar wrote that Brahmins were mostly 'beggars' and they lived off charity and alms from other groups. It is important to keep this in mind as we read further.  

The classification of Castes into a hierarchy of status was done by the British.  Epistemological arguments help establish this quite clearly. Ambedkar also had made several observations on the inconsistency of status among Jatis.

Post independence the Castes with higher status benefited the most, as the Britishers had planted the seeds of lack of mobility across Castes! There is enough epistemological evidence that the seeds of lack of mobility across Castes were planted by the British. 

The Britishers also obfuscated the perceptions of Indian society by bringing 'COLOR' into the fraudulent-constructed-system. This suited the British goal of creating a FALSE theory of themselves being superior. This was evident in the signs that the British put worldwide stating:

"Coloreds and Dogs Keep Out". 

Please note that these signs applied to ALL Indians and other natives worldwide. (Here it is relevant to note that it is important for people worldwide to be united in ensuring that Britain apologizes and compensates for these atrocities that resulted from their systems.)

Additionally, the Britishers benefited from this system by destroying unity among the Indians. Today again foreign interests, particularly the British benefit the most from this practice and then the politicians benefit in playing the vote-bank politics. 

• Who suffered due to Jati & still suffering?

While this orchestrated system is a loss for every Indian and an impediment for India's success, the Jatis that were classified the lowest suffered the most and are still suffering today. The British wanted some Castes to suffer disproportionately as only then society could be divided. The ones that could be most easily made to suffer were classified lower in the British hierarchy. There is evidence in Ambedkar's writing of how the British betrayed the lowest Castes and made them even more vulnerable and weak. 

We need to change that! We need all Indians of ALL Jatis to participate together in this change.

We believe we can make the arguments to support this vision.

We also believe Indian cultural and religious beliefs have a deep sense of humanity and equality allowing this change to be brought about very rapidly. We intend to destroy maliciously planted British systems.  

• Why people kill other Jati people? Why is inter-caste marriage an honor-issue.

Psychologically human minds are very fragile. Even the most intelligent minds process limited information to arrive at answers that they seek. This is a survival instinct and NOT a weakness of the individual or society. A planted sense of identity and honor can build hatred between communities. A study of civil wars across the planet helps us see how commonly this hatred can be developed. 

Indian history and mythology show lots of inter-caste marriages. The British constructed knowledge created the conditions where these marriages became forbidden. The British ridiculed natives worldwide by their skin color. The British also attached meanings of 'dirtiness' and 'lack of purity of blood lines' to skin color and racial or ethnic features through dubious race-studies. This they established in the minds of masses through fraudulent claims of these being 'advanced modern or scientific studies' which bring organization, civilization, and progress related benefits. These fraudulent race studies were the roots of new mass perceptions on race, ethnicities, superiority and hierarchy. 

This survival instinct has been manipulated to fool and divide people. 

We discuss the mechanisms and the long term impact. 

The long term impact is critical to understand as it creates anger across groups, because we fail to see that our behavior is impacted by our past and our manipulated education and the biases have been 'planted'. Our explanations are built on research and experience. We provide a bibliography of references as well. 

The study of the British roots of the Rwandan Genocide is a glaring and unfortunate example of the long term impact and the enormity of the crime of British race-science and related British propaganda. 

We would much appreciate your reading of our book. This is a big project of importance not just to every Indian but to every native on the planet that has suffered atrocities at the hands of the British or some of the other Europeans. Your feedback on the topic and participation in the process is essential for us to succeed in the ambitious goal of Annihilating British-Created-Caste and ALL inhumane practices associated with it.


Please NOTE that those who are suffering the MOST today, the weakest and poorest, will need everyone's help. And together we need to continue to support them till the scourge and scars of this British-Caste atrocity are removed for ever.

मूर्तिपूजा के कट्टर सैद्धांतिक विरोधी संप्रदायों में मूर्तियों का प्रयोग

कई संप्रदाय मूर्ति पूजा को एक अक्षम्य पाप मानते हैं। फिर भी विश्व की सबसे बड़ी मूर्तियों और मज़हबी इमारतें इन्ही सम्प्रदायों की हैं। दुनिया भर में, Jesus की 27 से भी अधिक मूर्तियां 65 फ़ीट से लम्बे कद की हैं। इस विसंगति के कारणवश हम निम्नलिखित टिप्पणियों का प्रलेख करने को प्रेरित हुए:

सबसे पहले हम बाइबिल के Old Testament की तीसरी पुस्तक से एक उद्धरण को देखें:

“Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the Lord your God. –Leviticus 26:1

यह इन सम्प्रदायों की पुस्तकों से मूर्तिपूजा पर सबसे सरलतम उद्धरण है। वास्तविकता इससे अधिक अव्यवस्थित एक भ्रान्तिक गुत्थी है। Protestant क्रिस्टियन का कहना है कि Catholic क्रिस्टियन मूर्तिपूजक हैं। Puritans जो कि अपने को अंग्रेजी समाज-सुधारक घोषित करते हैं वे कुछ शताब्दी से Roman Catholic चर्च की प्रथाओं से अपने को शुद्ध करने में जुटे रहे हैं। वे क्रिस्टियन क्रॉस को भी मूर्तीपूजा का रूप मानते हैं।

British-Caste-व्यवस्था पर हमारी किताब के संदर्भ में, यह ध्यान दें कि Caste शब्द का अर्थ जाति नहीं होता। Caste और Puritan शब्द लगभग समानार्थक हैं। Caste की प्रथा भारतीय नहीं है। यह अंग्रेजों के द्वारा फैलाई गई है। Caste के वर्ण हैं Octoroon, Quadroon, Quinteroon, जिनमे से कोई भी शब्द भारतीय प्रथाओं का सम्बोधक नहीं है।

मूर्तिपूजा की अंग्रेजों की परिभाषा कुछ इस प्रकार हैं:

आइडल (Idol): एक छवि या प्रतिमा जिसका पूजा की वस्तु के रूप में इस्तेमाल किया जाए।

आइडॊलेटरी (Idolatry यानि मूर्ति पूजा): चरम प्रशंसा, प्रेम या श्रद्धा किसी व्यक्ति संदर्भ या वस्तु के प्रति। Idolatry शब्द एक यूनानी शब्द का अंग्रेजीकरण है। 

भगवन की वैकल्पिक मानसिक छवि एक तरह से मूर्ति की परिभाषा ही है। 

इन परिभाषाओं से यह स्पष्ट है कि God की अवधारणा के किसी भी वस्तु, प्रतिनिधित्व या विकल्प में अंधश्रद्धा को ही आइडल (Idol) कहा जाता है। इस संदर्भ में मूर्तीपूजा का कट्टरता से खंडन खुद ही एक तरह का अन्धविश्वास यानि की आइडॊलेटरी ही है।

हमारी पुस्तक में हमने इस तरह के उदाहरणों पर विचार नहीं किया है। वो इसलिए क्योंकि हम मानते हैं कि जिस विसंगति को हमने यहां उजागर किया है वह युक्तिसंगत बनाई जा सकती है। हमारी पुस्तक में हम उन विसंगितयों को विचरते हैं जो कि हमें ऐसे ठोस प्रमाण देती हैं जिससे की हम British-Caste-व्यवस्था का निश्चित तौर पर खंडन करने में समर्थ हुए हैं।

धन्यवाद ।





हमारी पुस्तक का सारांश आप यहां पढ़ सकते हैं: पुस्तक सारांश।

Idols in staunchly dogmatic anti-idolatry belief sets

Several religions define idolatry to be a lower form of worship and at least practitioners of some religions find idolatry to be an unpardonable sin. Yet several of the largest statues or sacred constructions on the planet belong to these religions. Worldwide, 27 statues of Jesus are more than 65ft tall (excluding the base). This inconsistency inspired us to document the following observations:

First let us look at a quote from the third book of the old testament of the Bible, the book of Leviticus:

“Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the Lord your God". –Leviticus 26:1

This is the simplest quote on idolatry from these religions. The reality is more confounded. Protestants consider Catholics to be idolators. Puritans, english reformers who chose to chasten or purify their church from all Roman Catholic practices, consider the Christian cross to be idolatry.

In the context of our book on the British-Expounded-Caste-System, it is relevant to note that the word Caste is derived from Chaste meaning pure (as in puritan) and was used to refer to both pureness of sexual relations and consequently ancestral blood lines.

Given below are the definitions of idol and idolatry:

Idol: an image or representation used as an object of worship. An icon, a likeness, a fetish, totem, statue, figure, figurine, doll or carving.

Idolatry: extreme admiration, love or reverence for something or someone. The word is an Anglicization of the Greek word for Idol-worship

The word idol owes its root to Latin and Greek words that mean image, shape or form.

The Greek word eidolon referred to an idealized person or thing, a spectre, mental image or phantom.

It is evident from the definitions that a fetish towards any object, representation or substitute for the concept of god can well be called an idol. What we find inconsistent in the fanatically anti-idolatry belief-set is the derision or militancy expressed against idol-worship while advocating superiority of an alternate ‘mental image’ of god. The alternate mental image is an idol by definition!

In our book we do not consider such examples, because we concede that the inconsistency we have highlighted here may be rationalized. In our book we focus on inconsistences that help us disprove the British-Theory of the Hindu-Caste-System using arguments built on the rigor of propositional calculus. 

You can read the summary of our book at: Book Summary

Constructed-Knowlege and Propaganda as weapon: basic mechanism

While the term ‘constructed knowledge’ is modern the concept has been known for thousands of years. Creation of constructed knowledge with goal to manipulate and distort has also been practiced for a long time. Constructed knowledge, being subjective interpretations of objective reality, may appear to be individual creations. And in psychology that may very well be true. However, there is evidence that larger coordinated groups of people have indulged in the practice of constructing intentionally invalid knowledge for malicious purposes.

Weaponization of constructed-knowledge is propaganda.

The british propaganda machine is an example where seemingly unrelated entities produce content to corroborate specific intentionally created invalid-knowledge. The goal here being to destroy a victim, regardless of whether that victim is an enemy or not. Native populations worldwide have suffered at the hands of the malicious british propaganda machine. A few of the examples include: Rhodesia and several other parts of Africa, Natives of America, Aboriginals of Australia, China, India and the regions from Iran to Israel. If there are any specific examples that you want to bring to our attention or that you want us to explore further please leave us a comment below.

Our book looks at these mechanisms of weaponized propaganda in detail. Our epistemological tools also help us evaluate prior constructed-knowledge for invalidity. 

Our primary focus is on the British-Expounded-Hindu-Caste-System. We establish that the Caste System is British created and is still being perpetuated by the British propaganda machine.


You can read a summary here: Book Summary

Evidence of fraud by british theories on Caste - कुछ संत के नाम जो की ब्रिटिश की CASTE धोकाधड़ी को दर्शाते हैं।

The following saints who are very well known were not born into a brahmin family. These are some of the examples we use to highlight the fraud of the British-Expounded-Caste-System: 

Purandara Dasa, Kanaka Dasa, Valmiki, Vedvyas, Dnyaneshwar, Eknath, Chokhamela, Raidas, Nandanar, Kalidas, Surdas, ,Sant Tukaram, Thiruvalluvar, Ramdas, Sant Ravidas, Maharishi Vishwamitra, 

There are innumerable examples of such inconsistencies which do NOT match the British theories of caste in India. 

If you have names to add to this list please do not hesitate to comment or message us. We can also be reached on twitter @LearntLies

निम्नलिखित संत, जो बहुत अच्छी तरह से जाने  जाते हैं ब्राह्मण परिवार में पैदा नहीं हुए थे: 

पुरन्दर दास, कनक दासा, वाल्मीकि, वेदव्यास, ज्ञानेश्वर, एकनाथ, चोखामेला, रैदास, नन्दनार, कालिदास, सूरदास, संत तुकाराम, तिरुवल्लुवर, रामदास, संत रविदास, महर्षि विश्वामित्र,

ऐसे उदाहरण हमने अपनी पुस्तक में प्रयोग करें हैं। इनसे ब्रिटिश धोखाधड़ी निश्चित तौर पर समझ आती है।

ऐसी  विसंगतियों से ब्रिटिश लोगों द्वारा फैलाए CASTE के अवैध ज्ञान का खुलासा होता है। CASTE का झूट ब्रिटिश ने अत्यन्त दुर्भावना युक्त षड्यंत्रों के माध्यम से फैलाया। इसके हमे असंख्य उदाहरण मिलते हैं।

आपकी सोच में इन उदाहरणों की सूची में जोड़ने के लिए और नाम है, तो इस पृष्ठ पर नीचे टिप्पणी करें या हमे संदेश भेजने में संकोच नहीं करें। 

आप हमें ट्विटर के माध्यम से भी सन्देश भेज सकते हैं: @LearntLies 

धन्याद । 

'Left' और 'Right' की परिभाषा को त्यागने की विनती

अगर आप 'Left' और 'Right' करके भिन्न सोचों में भेद कर रहे हैं तो आप अंग्रेजों के जकड़न में फँस गए हैं।
यह परिभाषाएँ आपके सोच को अँधा बना देती हैं। जब हम किसी अन्य की सोच को 'Left' या 'Right' की परिभाषा दे देते हैं तब हम उस्की सोच को विस्तार से समझे बिना अपने अनुमान से उसकी व्याख्या कर देते हैं। इस प्रतिक्रिया से जिस अर्थ पर हम पहुंचते हैं वह विवादित हो जाता है।

इसी कारणवश हमारे पाठकों से विनती है की कृपया भारतीय जनसमुदाय के संवाद में 'Left' और 'Right' की परिभाषा करना त्याग दें।
धन्यवद।